Issues Navigator

Global Challenges

Strategic Regions

Domestic Debates

Tag cloud

See All Tags

May 5, 2008 |  2 comments |  Print | E-Mail Your Opinion  

James Jones

Military Alone Cannot Solve Afghanistan's Woes

James Jones: While NATO forces are needed in Afghanistan, the real focus should be on fighting narcotics, building up an effective judicial system, increasing Afghan police capabilities, empowering a single individual to represent the international community, and acknowledging regional difficulties.

General James L. Jones, special envoy for Middle East Security and former Supreme Allied Commander, Europe, spoke to the Atlantic Community's partner organization World Security Network:

There is a systemic failure in Afghanistan on the part of the international community in coming together to address the five most pressing issues in the country. They are not new, but have certainly intesified:

First, we need to begin to wage a successful fight against narcotics. The money earned from narcotics fuels the insurgency and creates a vicious cycle of death and terror that remains unbroken. That one can solve the problem by simply purchasing the poppy crop oversimplifies the issue as one would trigger an increase in production as a result of higher demand. There is no single solution; rather, a comprehensive approach, which includes subsidies for farmers, alternative crops, decisive action where farmers refuse to comply, and limited purchasing is needed and requires allies to cooperate internationally.

Second, to fight narcotics one must have an effective judicial system. Judicial reform has been very slow in development. There is no reason why the Afghani government cannot develop a more efficient, equitable system based on the rule of law.

Third, to have an effective judicial system, you need an effective police network, which is able to arrest criminals. Increased training, quality, and quantity of police to maintain security in the villages is also crucial.

Fourth, there is a need for a strong, empowered individual who can represent the international community to the government of Afghanistan. It was very disappointing that Lord Ashdown was rejected by the government, as this was least in the interest of the international effort or of Afghanistan itself.

Finally, Afghanistan needs to be seen in a regional context because of what is going on in Pakistan. At the very least, it is a two front operation. However, regional problems require regional solutions. Therefore, we need to reach out to other countries in coming to grips with a course of action Afghanistan.

The call for increased troops and capability is reasonable; however, tens of thousands of NATO soldiers are not required. Instead, focus on the international effort is needed. The major instruments of international power—EU, NATO, UN, World Bank, IMF, and G8— are all at work and they must be made to work better in order that Afghanistan can turn the corner.

General James Jones is special envoy for Middle East Security and a former NATO supreme allied commander

This video interview was conducted by the Atlantic Community's partner organization, the World Security Network.

  • 7
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this Article! What's this?

 
 
Comments
ilyas m mohsin

May 6, 2008

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Gen Jones has given very sane theoretical advice. He appears to be unaware of the ground realities in Afghanistan.
Launching a serious fight against Narcotics would make North look like South/East. The Northern warlords are making Billions of $ from this much sought-after resource. As such Karzai can have peace in that part where some development activity is also visible. The South copied north in producing narcotics as hunger and desperation set in due to the failure of the Kabul Govt to povide necessary food etc.
Capacity-building for police is a very slow process. As the 'occupation'
forces and the countries they represent failed to change the economic face of Afghanistan as promised in the Bonn Conference of 2002, no worthwhile reforms could be implemented for the upgradation of the administration. It remains, generally, pretty poor, tardy and backward.
Changing the court system is a far cry like the Army' reincarnation. Hence despondency prevails which helps the resistance by the Taliban in the South/East while warlords, making huge money in the north, side with the 'occupation'.One hopes that the Gen' dream gets realised in practice for the betterment of all concerned.
 
ilyas m mohsin

May 27, 2008

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
The recent attack on Karzai in a military parade betrays the immensity of the problem. Statements painting hopeful scenarios for the benefit of
less-informed audience in the West about the situation do not help the
'occupation.'
Realizing the desperate condition of NATO/US operations in Afghanistan, the UK, at long last, done what it ought to have done much earlier. It is now advocating negotiations with the 'enemy' as only brutal use of force has failed to tame the Pashto-speaking population now led by Taliban. The return of Taliban, once derided in Afghanistan, appears to be the outcome of policy-failures of the 'occupation.' Knowing history of the area and some bitter experiences in the area as a colonial power, the British have now started spilling the beans. If history is any guide, the 'enemy' would never surrender to an 'occupation' force, as it is seen in the country.
 

Create Comment

Type the characters shown in the image below into the textfield.
Captcha

What are tags?

Community

Jobs / Internships

Call for Papers

Atlantic Events

Partners

User of the day

Udo  von Massenbach
Udo von Massenbach
"Das Beste entfaltet sich im Jetzt. "

Poll


DW-WORLD.DE


Europe
Europe
Business




DW-TV Live DW-Radio Live