A recent Wall Street Journal article reported that many companies are giving
themselves ethical facelifts and spending more to prove to consumers that they
are responsible global actors. These actions take for granted the notion that
consumers will reward for such behavior, yet few companies actually invest in
research to investigate this assumption. June Cotte and Remi Trudel designed a
set of experiments intended to measure just how much people will pay for
ethically produced goods. For the purpose of the study, an ethically produced
good was defined as a good that was manufactured by a company which had
progressive stakeholder relations, followed progressive environmental
practices, and respected human rights.
The first experiment, which asked coffee drinkers how much
they would be willing to pay for a pound of coffee, revealed that consumers are
indeed willing to pay slightly higher prices for goods they believe to be
ethically produced and that they are only willing to buy unethically produced
goods if they are available at a steep discount.
The second experiment focused on the degree of ethicalness
which consumers demand and found that "once companies hit a certain ethical
threshold, consumers will reward them by paying higher prices for their
products. Any ethical acts past that point might reinforce the company's image,
but don't make people willing to pay more." Essentially this finding suggests
that while it makes sense for companies to pursue ethical practices, the
financial rewards from consumers for ethical behavior will have diminishing
returns.
In the final experiment, the importance of consumer
attitudes was measured. Results indicated that when consumers who expected
companies to behave ethically are compared to consumers who believe that
companies' actions are governed by financial interests, those who expect
ethical behavior are willing to pay higher prices for ethically produced
goods. This suggests that companies would do well to segment their markets and
target those consumers with high expectations.
One additional
consideration which companies should not forget is summarized in this video interview by Wall Street Journal Reporter Erin White with June Cotte:
A significant risk of
customer backlash exists if companies overstate their ethical or green
credentials. While consumers are willing to pay more for ethically produced
goods, they are also likely to frown on companies who they perceive make
exaggerated claims or are insincere in their efforts to be ethical or green. Companies
can avoid such backlash by being clear and honest about their practices and
letting consumers know what they are doing for the environment without
overstating their efforts.
The full article and various
figures/graphics are available on the Wall
Street Journal website. This summary was
prepared by Crystal Oswald-Herold of the Atlantic Community's editorial team.
Remi Trudel is a
doctoral candidate in marketing at the University of Western Ontario's Ivey
School of Business. Dr. June Cotte is the George and Mary Turnbull faculty
fellow and associate professor of marketing at the Ivey School.



May 29, 2008
ilyas m mohsin, ppp, Platinum Contributor (250)
Elementary economics has, so far, projected price-compititiveness also as a major consideration, generally, all over the Globe.Hence an attempt at recasting the research in this mode may tend to lead to the greatest happiness of the greatest number.