Issues Navigator

Global Challenges

Strategic Regions

Domestic Debates

Tag cloud

See All Tags

September 26, 2007 |  5 comments |  Print | E-Mail Your Opinion  

Get Moving, Europe!

Christine Otsver: Labor mobility in the EU-25 is shamefully low. One of the EU’s core concepts is freedom of movement, but getting more workers to resettle will take some radical rethinking.

A European community that keeps proper pace with globalization must implement structural, systemic, and societal changes that help citizens to move more frequently and permanently.

So far, the EU approach to labor mobility has been failing. Despite long-standing legislation and initiatives such as the Bologna process, the movement of labor within the EU has been extremely low. Less than two percent of EU-25 citizens live and work in a Member State different from their country of origin, and an average of only 7.2% of Europeans move each year, 15% of whom do it for occupational reasons. By contrast, 16.2% of Americans relocate annually, 17% of whom refer to a change in job as the main reason for their move.

To save the EU from falling further behind the US, policy makers should concentrate on three main planning areas:

1) Development of a uniform institutional structure that provides standardized, EU-wide social security coverage, and equitable pension benefits, works toward a consistent and understandable legal system, and conforms income tax codes across Member States.

2) A harmonized educational and vocational training system so that the qualifications and skills acquired in one EU country are fully recognized in another one. Higher educational systems should be further harmonized, and school systems joined and synchronized, so that the children of employees who move frequently within the EU are able to continue their studies without interruption.

3) Most importantly, the EU should provide a societal framework that makes relocation easier. This involves not only overcoming current habits that favor cultural embedding and an aversion to non-natives, but also fully establishing an EU-wide social community. Public relations firms, take note: this step involves redefining the "EU vision" itself and convincing citizens of 25 different member states that they all belong. A comprehensive marketing strategy must bring the EU to the people’s doorstep and beyond. Daily reminders of the social interconnectedness of this network should come not only through origin labels at the supermarket, but also on the way home, in family dining rooms, and other zones outside the workplace.

If the European Union wants to improve its depleted labor mobility rates, it must take drastic and wide-ranging measures. Ordinary policy instruments have not done the trick: it’s time to look into social engineering and marketing strategy. Without such policy innovations, Europeans will stay as immobile as they have in the past.


Christine Otsver holds a M.A. in German and European Studies from Georgetown University’s School of Foreign Service and a B.A. (maxima cum laude) in Political Science and German from La Salle University, Philadelphia, PA. She is currently a PhD. candidate in Political Science and Law at the Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich in Germany. She is also a research associate at Foreign Policy Research Institute in Philadelphia and a founder of the Transatlanticus blog.


A look at one facet of EU marketing strategy: sharing promotional videos on YouTube! Here’s one celebrating "unity through diversity" and welcoming the EU’s newest members in 2004.



Related Materials from the Atlantic Community:

  • 1
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this Article! What's this?

 
 
Comments
Peter  Männer

September 26, 2007

  • 1
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
I am sorry to question this fundament of your analysis: Why do you expect a benefit for the european economy if more citizens move around only because more americans do so?

For most europeans this is not part of the cultural way. People value their homeland and the social structures they grew up with. Many may be willing to work for a few years when they are still young and want to try something new. But the very most want to be home once they want to found a family - which often starts by building your own house. Not the kind of house you want to sell a few years later, but one you want to live in for at least a few decades.

Those that (have to) work somewhere else often miss their home and return as often as possible. Do you really think the motivation constraint resulting out of an "exile" emotion will improve their professional performance? I grew up and live in the state of Bavaria - one of the most thriving lands in entire Europe. But the people here usually even refuse to leave Bavaria to enter the rest of Germany - not to speak of an entirely different country!

I´m afraid to say so, but this clearly is a difference between continental european and anglo-saxon culture.
 
Julia  Frohneberg

September 26, 2007

  • 1
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
@ Peter:
1. With regard to this sentence "People value their homeland and the social structures they grew up with" I need to ask whether you have ever been to the United States? People might speak the same language in that country, but Texas and New York (take the Midwest and the West Coast) could not be any further apart culturally (the language barrier in any way I would consider to be the major restraint on labour mobility in Europe).
2. I do not know how many citizens in Europe actually build their own house and stay in it for the rest of their lives (-- to live in for at least a few decades). People in Spain live in apartments mainly, the same should be true for other countries. Also regarding Germany (where I think your argument is based on ultimately) I would doubt that most people live in their very own house.
3. Bavaria is certainly not the example to take as a comparison: Bavaria in many aspects I would consider a case of its own. It does not necessarily speak for the Bavarian people that they are so ignorant and non-curious about other parts of Europe (not even Germany as you say) but continue to live in their own cloud. Way to go I would say in the globalized world we live in.
4. The biggest hinderance to labour mobility is the inflexibility in the heads of employers and employees. I strongly agree with Christine Otsver that a big marketing campaign would do us good (the Sokrates/Erasmus program is proof that there certainly is no general opposition to moving around Europe).
 
Christine  Otsver

September 27, 2007

  • 1
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Dear Peter:
Thanks for your comment and your correct observation that I do assume that increased labor mobility will, in fact, be beneficial for the EU. It will increase the EU productivity and make the EU economy stronger. This, in fact, is the assumption that the market economics is based on as well as the EU policy itself.

Your resentment to leave Bavaria ---do not get me wrong, it is a beautiful place; I live there myself :) --precisely proves my point: the EU failed to encourage its citizens to take advantage of three freedoms, namely the freedom of movement of labor, by not successfully creating a social community within EU borders and marketing it throughout the whole Union (I am glad that you, Julia, agree with me!).

The the question still remains--suppose we do want to improve labor mobility within the EU-- how should we do it. Suggestions?
Tags: | labor mobility; EU; |
 
Donald  Stadler

September 28, 2007

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
I think that Europe has harbored a blind spot about the positive role of labor mobility in the dynamism of the US economy. Having a common currency and a common market are important factors in American prosperity, but the third and fourth legs of the stool are acommon language and a national labor market.

I see signs of labor mobility in Europe - in London, Nederlands, and possibly in parts of Germany. Much less so in France and Italy to date. Sadly another form of labor mobility is evident - the US has attracted hundreds of thousands of Europe's best knowledge workers. This is labor mobility but the benefits to Europe are not yet much evident.

Peter Manner seems to assume that the effects fo labor mobility will be coercive, with people forced to move away from their homeland. I disagree. I believe labor mobility will help both the nomads and the homebodies. When people are willing to relocate to improve their incomes there is an obvious improvement in productivity and income. But this will also increase competition in the labor markets in the places they leave. It may force employers to raise compensation and skill levels for workers who remain.

A common language is going to be a problem for Europe, but this may be solving itself for the relevant part of the workforce. I see no compelling need for most of the workforce to speak it - and it's obvious fopr the parts of the European labor force who do need it.
 
Cosmo  Macfarlane

October 1, 2007

  • 1
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
@ Julia
With regards to the sentence, "the Sokrates/Erasmus program is proof that there certainly is no general opposition to moving around Europe". Is this really the case? Surely the EU would not have to hand out grants of over 2000 euros to students if there was, "no general opposition to moving around Europe".

It should also be noted that the majority of the people who get these grants are language students, who have to do a year out in a foreign country, money or not. If such projects are going to have any real cost effective benefit, they need to be focused at people who normally wouldn't do a year abroad. Unfortunately, such people tend not to have the language skills that enable study in a foreign country in the first place.

Compulsory language education through the first year of university would be a solution - indeed this is already the case in many universities (unfortunately not my own). It would mean that most students could at least consider studying abroad later on in their degree.
 

Create Comment

Type the characters shown in the image below into the textfield.
Captcha

What are tags?

Community

Jobs / Internships

Call for Papers

Atlantic Events

Partners

User of the day

Lukas Michael Wagner
Lukas Michael Wagner
Member since
August 23, 2009

Poll


DW-WORLD.DE


Europe
Europe
Business




DW-TV Live DW-Radio Live