Issues Navigator

Global Challenges

Strategic Regions

Domestic Debates

Tag cloud

See All Tags

July 14, 2008 |  2 comments |  Print | E-Mail Your Research  

David  Francis

Other: John McCloy Journalism Fellowship Report: Energy Insecurity in the EU

David Francis: Germany is not only comfortable with Russia as an energy partner, it is comfortable with Russia as a strategic partner. This is at odds with the Bush administration, which views Russia with suspicion. Germany’s position has exposed an ideologically divide in Europe.

I returned to Berlin to conduct a few more interviews and tie up loose ends. After three days there, I took a train to Bonn. There, I had the privilege of spending an evening and a day with a former West German diplomat who was in East Berlin when the wall fell. Our conversations were not for attribution, so I cannot be specific in much of what he said. I was surprised, however, that a diplomat who had experienced life in Soviet East Germany was willing to accept Russia in its current state. The former diplomat, a good friend of the United States, echoed the view in Berlin that Washington overstates the threat that the new Russia presents. This diplomat said the United States had badly misplayed its hand in world affairs with its democratization agenda, an agenda that would continue to bring bad consequences into the next administration. This was disappointing, the diplomat said, considering the high esteem in which Germans held Americans after the Cold War. Those days, the diplomat said, are gone – no new U.S. presidential administration will change that.

The diplomat, on a walk through the old federal section of Bonn, told me about the Hanseatic League, which existed from the 13th to 17th centuries. The league was comprised of trading guilds, which held a monopoly over all commerce in the Baltic and North Sea regions and into Russia. The league stretched from northern Germany into Russia and brought prosperity to all the cities along its trade routes. The diplomat compared the Hanseatic League to what was happening between Germany and Russia today. Both sides again understand that more money can be made as partners than as enemies. A new league is forming and will thrive, no matter the opinion of the United States. A modern-day Hanseatic League is growing strong.

As often happens in Europe, history is repeating itself.

David Francis is a journalist based in Washington, DC. He recently traveled through Europe as a John J. McCloy Journalism fellow to report on energy securty issues. He can be reached through his Web site at www.dcfrancis.com.

 
  • 6
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this Article! What's this?

 
Tags: | energy security | energy policy | Germany | Russia | US |
 
Comments
Unregistered User

July 28, 2008

  • 1
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
US should consider joining the League, instead of building new walls between various countries, including European once. However, this approach to the world diplomacy has been forgotten in Washington long time ago... Obama may not be able/willing to change that.
 
Donald  Stadler

July 28, 2008

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
History repeating itself? Could be. Bismark allied Imperial Germany with Imperial Russia. Then Imperial Russia allied herself with France.

Sometimes historical themes repeat themselves somewhat. Then again, the current situation seems - unique. China and India are going to be superpowers, and power in the present era seems to be distributed as widely and diversely as has ever been in human memory. China, India, and Brazil are excellent examples.

A question I might ask is whether Germany and Russia forming a *new* Hanseatic League to the perceid detriment of other former members of the Hansa (Poland, Lithuania, Estonia, Latvia) is actually a true 'League' - or building a new kind of wall? A cage for the small countries in between. They surely seem to think so, which suggests an alternate historical parallel - the partition of Poland between Czarist Russia, Prussia, and Austria.

But actully this is neither. It is not a reincarnation ofthe Hansa nor a partition. But having been extinguished two times since 1780 - Poland's fears of such Germnan-Russian arrangements are possibly not unfounded. And let''s be clear here - if this is a new Hansa It is surely a curious one which cuts out Danzig and Talinnin. No?
 

Create Comment

Type the characters shown in the image below into the textfield.
Captcha

What are tags?

Community

Jobs / Internships

Call for Papers

Atlantic Events

Partners

User of the day

Thomas Nikola Debelic
Thomas Nikola Debelic
Member since
November 19, 2008

Poll

Is Hillary Clinton a good choice for Secretary of State?