Issues Navigator

Global Challenges

Strategic Regions

Domestic Debates

Tag cloud

See All Tags

4 comments |  Print | E-Mail Best Of Think Tanks  

Fear of Globalization is Rising in the West

Jacob Funk Kirkegaard | Peterson Institute | May 2008

Once upon a time in the West, the notion of globalization brought to mind new commercial outlets, the international exchange of goods and new post-industrial job opportunities. Yet, the integration of highly populated emerging economies, China and India in particular, has modified the circumstances of both Europeans and Americans. Ever more people on either side of the Atlantic now associate globalization with redundancies, unemployment, and threats to the national economy. Governments are challenged to make sure the atmosphere does not disintegrate completely.

Globalization is no more than a continuous process driven by the technical innovations and the differentiated economic policies of individual governments. It is an integrative process that opens up new export markets. The integration of emerging economies as equal partners to developed countries creates a real global economy. Yet to the bourgeois middle class in the USA and Europe, the integrative dimension of globalization is ever less obvious in the light of the transfer of jobs, know-hows and wealth to upcoming states. While in those countries, the prospects for an economically secure life are increasing, they are declining in the West. Advantages such as the savings realized when purchasing goods and services, or lower interest rates are pushed into the background. Concerning the job market in particular, there is ambivalence as to how globalization is perceived: So long as new jobs are being created, globalization is "great" whereas when jobs are being shed, it is "completely inacceptable". The problem here is the following: while those who benefit from globalization are often largely dispersed, the negative consequences such as redundancies often occur concentrated in one region, something which amplifies how badly it is perceived.

While in Europe, basic reforms have already been initiated (the Agenda 2010 in Germany for instance) and while the European social system protects people from the worst consequences of globalization, an adequate safeguard system is missing in the USA. In the USA, social status is largely dependent on whether one has a job or not. Job loss therefore often has dramatic consequences. In the worst of cases, one is threatened with a life without health insurance. And the education system needs reforming too. The USA did not least succeed in rising to superpower-status because of an amazingly well educated workforce, thanks to which the country was well prepared for the global economy and the progressive liberalization of commerce. In the meantime, the share of people with a high level of education is stagnating (a similar scenario to Germany) while this share is growing in countries such as Canada, Japan and Korea. Only far-reaching political reforms can prevent the public perception of globalization growing into stark opposition to the process. But one thing is sure: the process itself can no longer be stopped!

This summary was prepared by the Atlantic Community editorial team from "Perceptions and Realities of Globalization," published here by the Peterson Institute for International Economics.

Related materials from the Atlantic Community:

 

 

 
 
Comments
ilyas m mohsin

Sun, Jun 29th 2008, 08:28

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
If the 'bourgeois/ middle classes in US/EU feel threatened by the emerging trnds in Globalisation, this is nothing new. After all their foreftahres, generally, promoted slavery and some made huge rip-offs from thr same vile business. Many major West Europeans made their countries by exploiting colonies which they maintained in Asia/ Africa.
History indicates that one reason for Hitler' aggression was that he wanted his pound of flesh from the colonial assets for Germany.
The last sentence of the article indicates that, despite the glitches, the process of Globalisation apears to be an idea whose 'time has come.' So all those who spend $ etc in Billions on feeding pets and waste food in the US daily of the same order realized that it is better to save human beings dying of hunger etc in Africa/ Asia in Latin America. Once their conscience wakes up to such a reality, the aggressive Capitalism being pursued by the major players, including the socialists of yore and a down-trodden India, would get tempered by the Global ground-relities. This is because the people, particularly in the US, are good but naive and blissfully ignorant of what goes on in the world. Such consciousness would lead to a change of stance if not the heart.
 
Heinrich  Bonnenberg

Sun, Jul 6th 2008, 17:22

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
For a peaceful future it will be absolutely necessary to find the acting values for the future of the globilised world, as soon as possible. If there will be no result, not even a trying, the world is in danger to get catastrophes as in the last century, at the minimum.

Dear Ilyas M. Moshin,
be so kind to write a proposal of values which we all can discuss, something like a platform of values. I cordially ask you to start.
Thanks and all the best!
 
Richard  Wales

Fri, Aug 1st 2008, 21:01

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Globalization while touted as a great reaching out to the citizens of the workd is actually no more than a tool for corporate profit. Go where there are no labor, environmental or health and safety and work the locals untill you find a cheaper place to operate, then abandon the area. Reduce local labor and environmental laws in developed countries through WTO agreements in a steady effort to destroy the middle class. Make sure the WTO meetings and minutes are not accessable to the general public along with conflicts of interests of participants. This is globalization. Will globalization become a force to elevate human kind? Of course it will, or we won't survive. But the few who benefit under the current efforts will abuse the concept until they are forced to stop.
 
Amarjyoti  Acharya

Thu, Oct 2nd 2008, 17:55

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Globalization, unfortunately not only brings fresh mangoes in Winter to a mart in Ontario, Canada, but it also may bring with it the farmer who raised the crop in his orchard, in Venezuela. Alongwith certain Venezuelan practices the farmer has no control over and would be glad to escape, if he could. You would still need the mangoes and even bananas, maybe, in a mart in Lyons, France - from India. Again the farmer growing them in his orchard in Guntur, in India may bring with him certain practices that you do not pay for or over which he has no control. You may have a greedy mart-owner or a kind mart-owner and the farmer from Guntur may buy a house next door, in Lyons. So far so good.
But there are a lot of people who can not have mangoes in winter and may not like your having them, in your mart in winter! That is where there may be a problem with globalization, apart from concerns over your daughter deciding to spend the rest of her life in Guntur - without having the faintest idea of the very hot summers there alongwith those certain practices, or maybe your son wanting to wear 'lungis' - indian sarong - to school.
Those not liking your having mangoes and bananas in winter, on your table - may be friendly to the farmer from Venezuela or India, or be the trend-setters of those particular customs that the farmer has no idea about, except being socialized into it so much that it could come as a culture shock for him to discover that such practices are considered a felony in France or Canada. Just an illustration. Or your greedy and/kind mart-owner may find those practices inexplicable though not offensive and wonder over why the city suddenly has more advertisements for venereal diseases - a few years down the line - of many more such houses-being-bought-next-door!
Apart from finding a distinctly different falvour to the Municipal elections than what he is used to.
Though the real problem would more be about those not liking your having mangoes and bananas on your table, in winter.

Tags: | globalization | fears |
 

Create Comment

Type the characters shown in the image below into the textfield.
Captcha

What are tags?

Community

Jobs / Internships

Call for Papers

Atlantic Events

Partners

User of the day

Ulrike  Guérot
Ulrike Guérot
Member since
February 4, 2008

Poll

Is Hillary Clinton a good choice for Secretary of State?