As an open think tank, we provide a platform for anyone with good ideas on how to improve transatlantic policy. We encourage students and professionals to develop and share their analyses, commentary, and policy advice on contemporary issues of the economy, international security, and globalization. This text will explain how to: plan your arguments and structure your piece. Please read the entire text carefully before sending in a submission.
Policy Focus: While the purpose of academic work is often to analyze a complex issue in-depth, the goal of a think tank publication is to provide clear solutions for decision makers. We don’t need to know the full history of a country. At atlantic-community.org, we aim to generate well thought-out policy recommendations; the statements “China is rising” or “America needs to reassure her allies” are only general observations. Quickly establish the problem or issue that you’re discussing and finish with concrete, practical steps you recommend to improve the situation.
Feasibility: Make constructive policy recommendations that are actionable by decision makers in European and North American governments and related international organizations. Don’t just call for more research or “engagement” or say we need more dialogue.
For example, how exactly should the EU address the sovereign debt crisis or how should Obama change his policy toward Iran? Will your policy recommendations cost money? If so, explain how you’d pay for it. Including a solution will make your argument even more convincing.
When you suggest a solution, give an example of it working elsewhere. Look for great examples that breathe life into your arguments. Avoid abstraction. Always use specific references and easy-to-understand data.
Be Creative: “America is declining … and China is rising” has been said over a thousand times before! Be creative with both your ideas and approach to common issues. What can you offer to the debate that is unique and interesting?
Your Headline: Readers have short attention spans. Draw them in with a strong headline that emphasizes your central message. A catchy title will help sell your piece and allow readers to grasp your ideas quickly.
Your Thesis: Your thesis is a short taste of your article and is the most important part. It is 2-3 short sentences that entice us to read your article, the way an abstract would, without giving too much away. This abstract will be published below the headlne.
Your Main Argument: You need to grab the reader’s attention in the first line. Express your opinion in your opening paragraph. Always come down hard on one side of the argument. Never equivocate. Don’t waste words giving too much background information. Don’t “clear your throat” with witty or historical asides. Get to the point and convince the reader that reading your article is worth the effort.
Framing the issue: Tell the reader why they should care about the issue. Imagine you are a busy person reading your article. At the end of each paragraph, ask yourself, “So what? Who cares?” Your article should answer these questions.
After you have made your argument, anticipate what the contrarians might say. Use one sentence to identify the strongest counter argument and refute it with facts. For example, “Some might argue that bombing Tehran is the only option, however…”
Language: If your English is not perfect, don’t worry! Our editorial team can help you improve your writing. We look for clear and innovative policy recommendations. At Atlantic Community, your ideas and policy recommendations come first.
Be Active: The active voice (“I believe…” or “this means…”) is more concise and easier to read than the passive voice (“it could be argued that”). Use active verbs and try to avoid adjectives and adverbs. By being direct you give your argument more strength.
Keep it Short: Anyone should be able to understand your argument. Short sentences make your argument clearer. Short paragraphs make your article easier to read. Avoid technical jargon, acronyms, and obscure references. Cut long paragraphs into two or more shorter ones. Only use technical details when they are essential to your argument. Using simple language doesn’t mean simple ideas. It means successfully conveying your solutions to people who lack your expertise. Also remember to keep your submission between 500-700 words.
References: We do not publish footnotes, but please give credit to other people’s work. Wherever possible, you should provide hyperlinks to your sources.
Your Ending: Your final paragraph should summarize your argument with a catchy, thought-provoking final sentence. Please avoid clichés, such as “we need to help the Arab genie force its way out of the bottle.” Make sure your ending tells decision makers what actions they should take.
Practice makes perfect: Do not be intimidated by these guidelines. It’s important to get started (and overcome the blank-page syndrome). Once you begin writing, you are likely to end up past the 700-word limit and then need to shorten your article. So, get started with writing and then revise and improve based on the above guidelines. Nobody writes perfect prose in their first draft.
Need more guidance? There are thousands of published pieces already on our website; feel free to treat them as samples. You can also contact the editorial team at firstname.lastname@example.org
For additional requirements and information on how to write and submit your article, including how to upload a photo onto your Atlantic Community Profile, please click here.
We look forward to reading your submission!
Browse recent posts
It is over. Donald Trump has lost. After four years of chaos, the self-declared saviour of America failed to convince the voters in key states such as Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania to grant him another term. Their choice will have a significant impact on German-American relations. President-elect Joe Biden campaigned on nothing less than restoring the soul of the American nation.The new administration faces a raging pandemic and a troubled economy, much like the rest of the world. Nevertheless, Biden’s foreign policy will be substantially different from Trump’s. After years of troubled relations with one of America’s most important allies, Biden will have to try to re-engage with Germany. Berlin ought to be prepared.read more
Recent calls from German policymakers and think-tankers for a public security policy debate indicate the importance of discourse for security policy. However, this is only the tip of the iceberg. Discourse – or how we talk about things – exerts significant power over security policy decision-making; setting the framework for how we define good and evil, identify threats, and which policy options are legitimate (or even thinkable) means of confronting them. Just how powerful discourse can be is demonstrated by Dr. Frank Stengel’s latest analysis on ideational change in German security policy. The concise, well-structured work introduces a novel analytical approach, combining post-structuralist, feminist and post-colonial discourse theory, providing much needed insights into Germany’s often contradictory relationship with the use of military force.read more
November 2020, US-Präsidentschaftswahlen. Die ganze Welt blickt auf die USA, so auch wir in Deutschland. „Wie geht es weiter mit der atlantischen Gemeinschaft?“, fragen sich einige. Für viele ist klar, dass es nur besser werden kann, wenn Trump aus dem Amt gewählt wird. Zu lange, so denken viele, wurde im Weißen Haus gelogen, betrogen und respektlos mit der Welt – einschließlich Amerikas Partnern – umgegangen. Unzählige Zeitungen malen sich aus, wie die USA bis 2024 wohl aussehen würden. In den Projektionen schwingt eine klare Nachricht mit: Wir erwarten mehr von den USA. Viele in Deutschland sind enttäuscht von einem Land, das aber gleichzeitig noch immer viele Sehnsüchte zu wecken scheint. Da stellt sich die Frage, was wir eigentlich von den USA wollen?read more